Etc. -- Helmer vs. Learn: Part 4
Introduction | Source Documents | Other Sources | Photocopies | Back 

A lightly edited transcription of a page 1 article from the 4 Nov 1920 issue of the Simcoe Reformer newspaper. Also see: Helmer vs. Learn: Part 1

LORNE HELMER GIVEN 18 MONTHS

Guilty of Manslaughter 
Send to Reformatory

For killing North Walsingham farmer James A. Learn, after the verdict of the jury, "Guilty of manslaughter," the sentence meted out to 20-year old Lorne Helmer last Thursday by Mr. Justice Kelly was 18 months in the reformatory.

In passing sentence His Lordship said that while personally inclined to let the prisoner go, his duty and the necessity of protecting the public by punishment of serious crime prevented this course. 

He took into consideration the prisoner's past record and family history, both favorable, his voluntary military service, his having assumed the full responsibilities of manhood and his three months' previous confinement, and he expressed the opinion that good conduct would shorten the term.

In the fact of recent happenings, Justice Kelly said he felt that the discharge of Helmer would be unwise. Since 
20 Sep 1920 until the beginning of his week, west and north of Toronto, not less than 17 murder cases have come to trial or will come up for trial -- "an awful record for any section of the province."

Learn's son, who lives in Napoleon, Ohio, did not come over for the trial. There was no estate to look after. It developed during the trial that Learn was considerably in debt to the elder Mrs. Helmer and that the year's crop was not sufficient to liquidate this.

The prisoner's young wife was not in the courtroom when her husband received sentence, nor was his mother or any of the other relatives. When seen by his mother shortly after sentence was pronounced, he told her that he did not feel guilty.
 

 

Copyright 2018 John Cardiff