Etc. -- Helmer vs. Learn: Part 1
Introduction | Source Documents | Other Sources | Photocopies | Back 

A lightly edited transcription of a pages 1 and 7 article from the 5 Aug 1920 issue of 
the Simcoe Reformer newspaper.

LORNE HELMER IS IN NORFOLK JAIL

Young Walsingham Farmer 
Charged With Causing the 
Death of James A. Learn 
of the Same Township

The daily newspapers of last Saturday and Monday featured the arrest of Lorne Helmer of North Walsingham on a charge of murder. The news created quite a little talk in the western portion of the county, where the parties are well known.

The victim of the tragedy, James A. Learn, came into Norfolk a few years ago from Elgin [County]. He is thus described by the St. Thomas Times-Journal.

James Learn was perhaps one of the best-known characters in Yarmouth Township, and almost a life-long resident. He was born on the old Learn farm near the cheese factory at Mapleton, residing there for nearly 50 years.

About 10 years ago he disposed of the farm shortly after the death of his first wife, and purchased a farm near Langton in Walsingham Township, near the farm on which his body was found.

He remained there about two years, then he returned to this district, purchasing a farm near Dexter. 

He moved again a few months later, buying a farm in South Yarmouth, where he resided until the death of his second wife, about two years ago, when he returned to Walsingham, buying a farm near Silver Hill.

His farm in Yarmouth he sold to Mrs. Mary Helmers, who resides there at the present time and who is said to be the mother of Lorne Helmer, the young man accused of the crime.

The victim of the tragedy was noted for his many eccentricities. He is described by those who knew him intimately as having been a peacefully natured man, never at any time quarrelsome.

He had a weakness for buying and selling property, purchasing the old hotel at New Sarum shortly after prohibition was introduced. He is still assessed as owner of the land.

Another of his eccentricities was his annual announce-ment that he was a candidate for the reeveship of Yarmouth. He never carried out this threat.

He came into prominence about three years ago when he brought an action against a young women for alleged breach of promise. The unique case was dismissed after being heard in local courts. Learn had married before the case was heard.

Learn had no children. Two sisters are said to survive him, a Mrs. Zavitz and Mrs. Leitch of Sault Ste. Marie.

He worked for some time on the Michigan Central Railway as a section laborer.

Learn, the dead man, and Lorne Helmer, the latter a returned soldier, had been living on the same farm, and it is alleged that disputes over the occupancy and other matters were the prime factors in the tragedy.

It is believed Mr. Learn's death occurred about July 12th or 13th. T. R. Slaght, K.C., stated that a few days ago it was reported to him that neighbors felt much unease regarding the aged man. 

On Wednesday morning, July 29th, Mr. Slaght says, information indicating foul play was brought to him, and he immediately ordered a thorough search and communicated with the Ontario Police Department.

Early Thursday morning the searchers found the body of Mr. Learn in a small woods on Lot 19, Concession 7, North Walsingham, which adjoins Lot 20, where he lived. The find was made on a lot controlled by the Helmers.

Mr. Slaght states that he directed constabes to keep Lorne Helmer under surveillance. In the mean time Detective Miller proceeded with the result that Helmer was arrested on Friday on a warrant issued by Squire John Abel of Silver Hill. It was Constable Roy Marshall who brought Helmer to Simcoe jail.

Learn's body was found in a narrow trench some 20 feet lon and two feet wide. A large tree had fallen at right angles across the trench. The murderer or murderers rolled the tree to one side, and after placing the body in the hollow of the ground, they covered it with leaves, then replaced the tree.

So accurate was the information as to the whereabouts of the body that it was less than three hours after the hunt commenced that the remains were found.

On the finding of the body Coroner McGilvery of Simcoe was notified and he at once proceeded to the scene. A jury was empanelled and an inquest opened.

The following gentlemen constitute the jury: -- 
Wm. McIntosh (foreman), J. W. Kreiss, R. Murphy, 
W. Mayo, Henry Brayley, Thos. Marshall, 
Edward Marshall, Pat Chambers, Norman Brown 
and Wm. Roney.

After complying with the law as to viewing the remains, an adjournment was taken until tomorrow (Friday) when the hearing will be continued at the Silver Hill Hall. 
Dr. Meek was ordered to the authorities to make a post-mortem examination.

The opinion prevails throughout the community that the success of the authorities in discovering the remains was due to a confession in their hands made either by Lorne Helmer himself, or by a younger brother of his, a lad of fifteen. Also that it was on facts disclosed by this confession that Helmer was placed under arrest.

Learn lived on the Helmer farm, Lot 20, Concession 7, Walsingham, in the same house as did the accused and his bride of nine months.

Just what cause there was for an ill-feeling between the two men has not yet been ascertained by the Crown.

Learn formerly lived near Aylmer, but several years ago he sold his farm there to Helmer's mother and made an agreement with her to work on her farm on which he was living at the time of his death.

It is said in some quarters that he sold the farm at a very low price in expectation of marrying Mrs. Helmer, who became a widow four years ago, about which time Learn lost his wife.

Upon searching the house the officers discovered a diary kept by Learn and which was entered up until July 11th. This is taken as an indication that the crime was committed some time on the 12th.

According to stories told by neighbors of the parties, Learn had made some agreement with the accused as to living together but he tired of it and ordered Helmer and his wife to leave. 

Helmer refused and finally the dead man obtained an order from the courts instructing Helmer to leave. This was served on July 12th by Constable Marshall but Helmer was not at home at the time and it was given to young Mrs. Helmer.

While the constable was at the farm he saw Chas. Helmer, the 15-year-old brother of the accused in his bare feet coming from the back of the farm.

Learn, who was a man of his word, had promised to assist a neighbor, George Alexander, on the 13th, but his failure to appear caused some speculation. After a few days the anxiety over his absence died away for a week, but was then revived stronger than before.

----------

The accused, Lorne Lorenzo Everald Helmer, is a young man, between 20 and 21 years of age, with no previous bad mark upon his character. When recruits were called for the 133rd Norfolk Battalion, he was considerably under 18, and applied for his mother's consent to enlist. This he obtained and he went in 1917 to the fighting line. 

He brought home with him a clean record, when the fighting was over. He was married less than a year ago. He  is the eldest of the five sons of the late Lorenzo Helmer of Walsingham. He has two sisters, both married.

-- also see Helmer vs. Learn: Part 2

 

Copyright 2018 John Cardiff